The article discusses the need for more effective planning interfaces and boundary objects for collaborative planning with agents in software engineering. Current interfaces are limited by the European navigator approach, where humans make plans ahead of time, and the agent executes them without human oversight, leading to a mismatch between human and agent understanding. Thicker interfaces and better boundary objects are needed to facilitate collaboration between humans and agents, incorporating visual, spatial, and social elements to make plans more legible and interactive. AI summary
Firehose
Filtered to tagged “collaborative planning” · clear filters
Browse: People · Companies · Papers · Podcasts · Hacker News · Deep dives
Browse by tag
artificial intelligence 82continual learning 29AI 26agentic coding 17reinforcement learning 16open-weight models 11AI agents 10AI safety 9AI ethics 8cybersecurity 8machine learning 7open-source 7language models 6natural language processing 6Reinforcement learning 6artificial general intelligence 5deep learning 5Diffusion models 5Agentic AI 4computer vision 4conversational AI 4ethics 4existential risk 4large language models 4LLMs 4Recursive self-improvement 4robotics 4security 4vision-language models 4ai 3
The article discusses the need for more effective interfaces and boundary objects in collaborative planning with agents, as current systems are limited by a "European navigator" approach that assumes humans and agents can work together seamlessly, which is not the case. Effective boundary objects should be designed to adapt to both human and agent needs, rather than optimizing for the agent's performance. A thicker interface that incorporates visual, spatial, interactive, and social ways of thinking is necessary to facilitate human understanding and legibility. AI summary