Papers

Filtered to policy optimization · clear filter

Browse by term

continual learning 33reinforcement learning 21large language models 9vision-language models 8language models 6benchmarking 5autoregressive models 4diffusion transformers 4generative models 4multimodal learning 4robotics 4video generation 4benchmarks 3computer vision 3policy optimization 3self-distillation 3vision-language-action models 3world modeling 3agent-based systems 2autonomous agents 2calibration 2coding agents 2diffusion models 2foundation models 2image synthesis 2in-context learning 2knowledge graphs 2LLMs 2multimodal evaluation 2multimodal large language models 2

Matching papers

When Does Muon Help Agentic Reinforcement Learning?

13 upvotes · 17 JUL 2026 · Kai Ruan, Jinghao Lin, Zihe Huang et al.

This paper investigates the use of the Muon optimizer in reinforcement learning (RL) post-training and finds that it can significantly improve the success rate of RL agents, especially when combined with other techniques like policy optimization and advantage estimation. Practitioners in RL may care about this research to explore new ways to improve the performance of their agents.

Beyond Euclidean Clipping: Overcoming Exploration Collapse in LLM RL via Riemannian Isometric Policy Optimization

12 upvotes · 11 JUL 2026 · Zhicheng Cai, Xinyuan Guo, Hanlin Wu et al.

This paper addresses a problem in reinforcement learning (RL) where algorithms with PPO-Clip suffer from "exploration collapse", where they fail to explore new areas of the environment. The authors propose a new method called Riemannian Isometric Policy Optimization (RIPO) that helps to balance exploration and exploitation by using a more accurate geometric metric.

Beyond Entropy: Correctness-Aware Advantage Shaping via Contrastive Policy Optimization

10 upvotes · 16 JUL 2026 · Weiwen Xu, Jia Liu, Hou Pong Chan et al.

This paper proposes a new method for advantage shaping in reinforcement learning called Contrastive Policy Optimization (CPO), which uses contrastive disagreement between reference-guided and vanilla generation distributions to indicate correctness. Practitioners might care because it can improve the effectiveness of reinforcement learning methods in generating correct responses.